Whether or not the sweeping changes in the research funding landscape have impacted your office, one thing is certain: the times are changing, and it’s up to you to change with them.

does your process use systems that do not talk to each other?

  • Email

  • Spreadsheets

  • Drop Box

  • File folder

What if you could instantly have total access, total clarity, and total control over your limited submission and review processes?

The InfoReady Review workflow automation platform is the go-to solution for over 100 institutions across the country. And how have we won almost 30% of the higher education research market? Because we help offices accomplish more with less. Less hands, less time, less budget. More results.

Accomplish more, immediately

  • Easily automate posting, collection of applications, routing and all the other busy work of the limited submission process

  • Our clients on average reduce administrative busywork by 90%

  • Drastically increase your productivity and reach

  • Minimal training

  • No need to burden IT

  • Access the system from any computer connected to the internet

Top-notch support - when you need it

Knowledgeable staff - comprehensive video-based training library

  • White glove treatment Monday-Friday 9am - 8pm EST

  • 24/7/365 access to our comprehensive video-based training library

  • Deep experience in getting you up and running in no time

  • Solving our clients' issues is a cornerstone to our business

  • We're proud of our 99% retention rate!

Here's what your peers are saying

“The medical school needed an online tool for limited submissions and bridge fund applications. We were struggling with using email and storing a large number of documents on various servers. It wasn’t very open or transparent. InfoReady Review has solved all of these problems for us.”

Jessica Durkin
Associate Director of Research
University of Michigan Medical School

“InfoReady Review reduces time spent checking applications by 2/3. It reduces time spent routing proposals to reviewers and aggregating scores by half. We spend about an hour per competition reminding reviewers to complete their work. Historically, collecting post-award data has been inconsistent. [Making the ability to collect] post-award data straightforward and easy to do is a great added value to our campus from InfoReady Review. The application is getting rave reviews from those who have used it. It has reduced time and effort required to post a competition, collect application materials, review applications, report review results, and summarize review results. We are eager to deploy InfoReady Review for more use cases.”


Jason Miller
Research and Sponsored Programs Office
California State University, Channel Islands

“Before InfoReady Review, our annual poster competition was a logistical nightmare, requiring time and resources of five staff members. Now we're able to collect entries through a standardized submission process, offer online judging, and automatically report on participation details. Judges love it, submissions are of a higher quality, and we're saving significant resources – with InfoReady Review I am able to manage the poster competition entirely on my own.”


Leslie Paige
Coordinator of Scholarship and Sponsored Projects
Fort Hays University